Message: previous - next
Month: April 2018

Re: [trinity-users] Re: more re. tde and qt5

From: "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" <office@...>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 11:27:33 +0200
Am Sonntag, 29. April 2018 schrieb deloptes:
> In my opinion the PGPG support in KMail is pretty sufficient to enable
> secure communication with any recipient.
> Why would you bother paying for something you already have? 
> I ask myself if you clearly understand the concept of encrypted mails?
> regards

The point of protinmail - as I see it - was an email address, that could not be associated with a real person. But protonmail changed the initial user authentication to require a handy or some other identifyable device, so the main purpose is gone.

But what I miss in kamil+PGPG is an encrypted mail-subject, e.g "Subject: [trinity-users] Re: more re. tde and qt5" beeing replaced by a random string, which gets replaced on the receiver side with an embedded subject from within the encrypted mail. Reason is, that a lot of users use a subject that tells a lot about the mail content, at least enough to let it be sorted in "interesting" or "junk".


Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ...