On Monday 12 September 2011 20:07:02 John A. Sullivan III wrote: > Sorry but as much as there are all kinds of technical and security > reasons why this should not be done (which I wholeheartedly embrance and > which is why KDE resisted for so long), the business case is > overwhelming. �KMail is a non-starter without it in many environments - sure, but why the heck should it (especially the kde 3.5.x version) be a 'starter' in an ms-outlook-crap dominated environment ? makes no sense, IMHO. those who want/need things like that, for whatever reason, are surely better off with kde 4.x (which has even more 'ms-features' anyways) werner