On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Lisi wrote:

>On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:17:58 Bimal Rekhadiya wrote:
>
>Personally, I have looked at all three and I strongly dislike all three.  They
>are exclusive not inclusive (i.e. not accessoble to the handicapped), do not
>follow web standards (don't work with Konqueror, my usual and preferred
>browser - ironic for sites that are proposed as suitable for Konqueror's main
>home) and are far too glitzy.

+1

>Yes sure.. Here are some links of my work:
>
>http://www.brcreation.com/

Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
Result: 4 Errors, 1 warning(s)

>http://www.kallina.eu/

Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: 54 Errors, 67 warning(s)

>http://www.jareddurrant.com/

Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: 4 Errors, 1 warning(s)

>and so many..

Indeed

Jonesy	who does websites, too -- but I ain't ever going to
	barge in on someone else's turf without an invite...
-- 
  Marvin L Jones     | jonz         | W3DHJ  |  linux
   Pueblo, Colorado  |  @           | Jonesy |   OS/2     __
    38.238N 104.547W |   config.com | DM78rf |            SK