trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: December 2010

Re: [trinity-users] What for is QT4 migration?

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 14:08:51 -0600
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:14:32AM +0000, Tiago Marques wrote:
>> >From the little I know, Qt4 would actually be faster if the apps were
>> not
>> more heavyweight themselves.
> So one question comes to mind: why qt4 apps with the same or less
> end-user functional as qt3-apps consume much more resources then, again,
> qt3-ones in case of kde4?

Qt4 seems to encourage sloppy (slow/memory intensive) coding for some
reason.  Also, Qt4 lacks many functions that Qt3 offered, leaving
programmers to try to re-implement them.  I have found that many of these
re-implementations are less efficient than the original internal Qt3 code
was, partially due to unexposed internal Qt variables.

Just my $0.02.

Tim