On Sun, January 29, 2012 16:38, E. Liddell wrote: >> You are right about the organized effort. > > Yeah. Problem is that no one seems to want the job of organizer > (including > me!). Well.. i don't want it because i don't really have enough knowledge about c/c++,cmake,automake etc.. to be competent enough. Also the mix from automake/cmake seems to be the biggest to not remove/rewrite the eclasses from ground up. Maybe we should start with a clean cmake-only overlay to get things streamlined? It might take some time to get everything in there, but seems to be the only clean solution. > The eclasses seem to be accretions that go back all the way to the dawn > of KDE3--I mean, I found a comment in there that was about 3.2. Probably > some of the code is cruft that could be thrown out, but I'm not > knowledgeable > enough to be able to tell which bits are junk and which are still useful. Yes, they have only been fixed to work with newer kde-versions. >>The ebuild also came down to the following error which seems >> to be an code-error? >> >> kxinewidget.cpp:2641:66: error: invalid conversion from âconst char* >> const*â to âchar**â [-fpermissive] > > Looks like a code error to me, too . . . Pointer casting like this is one > of > the reasons I hate C/C++--in a sane language, that would never have > compiled to begin with, and the original coder would have had to fix it. > > Say, which arch are you on? I'm on amdfam10. BTW it also seems that there are problems detecting the correct qt-path when qt4 is installed (just tried installing sopcast, to watch the handball-em final, it's not being broadcasted in germany;( ). greetings, Roman --