trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: January 2011

Re: [trinity-users] sudo-trinity in Debian Squeeze

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:32:29 -0600
> (Moving discussion of sudo-trinity to a new thread.)
>
> On Fri January 14 2011 10:42:59 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> The reason for the third-party sudo is simply to add /opt/kde3/bin and
>> friends to the built-in RPATH variable, thus allowing Trinity
>> applications
>> to be launched via "sudo <appname>", instead of "sudo
>> /opt/trinity/bin/<appname>".  That's the only change; if you don't trust
>> me grab the source of the official sudo package and the modified one and
>> run a diff between them. ;-)
>
> $ diff -r sudo-1.7.4p4/ sudo-trinity-1.7.2p7/ | wc -l
> 112770
>
> Would it be possible to have kde-core-trinity depend on sudo, and to
> have sudo-trinity conflict with sudo and provide sudo?
>
> This would allow people to retain Debian's sudo if they prefer.
>
> --Mike Bird
>

I suppose that would be an acceptable solution, barring any unforeseen
problems.  Before I implemented the sudo-kde3/sudo-trinity system, I was
receiving constant bug reports about Trinity applications not working with
sudo, so you can understand my reluctance to alter the packaging at this
point.

I wish Debian would consider the merits of a separate configuration file
for sudo though, as right now it forces me to say "pick your
poison"--either Trinity won't work properly (especially in kcontrol), or
you have to use have a possibly less secure sudo (although this is
somewhat unlikely).

Tim