On Thursday 28 June 2012 09:31:26 pm Dan Youngquist wrote: > On 06/28/2012 06:08 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote: > > Lou Gogan wrote: > > > Is there a different installation page with instructions of how to > > > > obtain a > > > > > working version of trinity? Is there a working version? > > > > I strongly suggest Slavek's packages. I have deployed them on all of my > > systems with great success. > > Part of his point was that the installation instructions on the website do > not result in a working system. This is something we talked about here > several months ago, and nothing has been done about it. Repeating what I > said then, how many people do you think have found the website, tried to > install Trinity according to the instructions there, ended up with a > hopelessly buggy system and a lot of time wasted, and will never try > Trinity again? Lou is one of a tiny minority who have come to the mailing > list looking for help -- many, many more simply go away quietly. > > How hard would it really be to fix the website? What would it take -- 20 > minutes? And how many are there here who are perfectly capable of doing it > if given access? It would move the project from a few developers and > die-hard dedicated groupies, to an actual viable DE that anyone can install > and use. I would've thought that would be a pretty high priority, but what > do I know? I was not really aware of this problem as I use Porteus, David Hare's Exe, or an older version of PCLinuxOS with KDE 3.5.10 (and Bodhi with E17). I have to agree that this is an absolutely crazy situation and does Trinity no good whatsoever. I assume that the situation is as described. (It seems so bizarre that I feel compelled to state this disclaimer.) +1 for fixing it. Andy