trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: July 2012

Re: [trinity-users] [sort of OT] Trinity etc. are damaging Linux

From: Bryan Baldwin <bryan@...>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:50:42 +1200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/26/2012 04:47 AM, Brad Alexander wrote:
> Concur. And if I am honest, I could not be bothered to look up the 
> license. Like you, I avoid Ubuntu like the plague. I went back to 
> dumped Ubuntu and went back to Debian around Gutsy. Between the
> broken encryption in the installer and the beginnings of what I saw
> as the writing on the wall (which has borne out over the years),
> I'm much happier with pure Debian.

I was doing Sarge back in the day when I tried Ubuntu 6.10. I still
have the CD I'd burned. I used it for about 90 days and went back when
Etch came out. I may have already mentioned I left Debian for Arch
when I discovered GFDL packages in non-free. I did Arch and from
scratch for awhile, then Gentoo and from scratch after that.

Unity is GPLv3, btw. I suppose after several years of development it
might reach a point where it could be ported around without so much
effort. If Mr. Morrison is correct when he says Unity requires
excessive low level patching (and I have no reason to think
otherwise), I imagine its development strategy will largely be
Canonical's burden. One might think that's what they wanted all along.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQEGoyAAoJEM5s7GXJ0FEIC1kIAK63K8GJ77Ppqe6i1aS/Tlla
/k/rau/kKwZE4EqgPSbrRFXC9xI9E8I9aqxNqlBggQmMgIBFNsV30fEkbcw3jGdS
A7m65TMJ9NW1Br7PWwTQAqE6Qqbh3xNcrghOGQuBj1ZmM55tj0B32jXo6xbKw6iV
/pkHanUNyl8tKVp3WIB7KjYZTm+WBqwusiFMVC8x7Vb5GEtwx/D8BIHn1bXTq1qA
/0vXJLt7REDyxx6pJFqq/1LDdGqM8bce8qd6AYrm1QhWr7yseg1z6o+uHwtSm/wU
W60WhJ4x+cjhw0Dau1/Ex5xA1R19pshfcBTE5hTQ5JAEPWdxaMytxQuM5eOBw2Q=
=caM7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----