On Tuesday 18 of September 2012 17:23:19 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > Note: I noticed that for R14 is dependency libogg-dev-la replaced to
> > libogg-dev. Tim, please, it caused some complications? It can also be
> > used for 3.5.13.1?
>
> I have not yet completed an R14 rebuild set with the dependency changed; I
> still expect some packages to fail and require patching.
>
> Tim
>

Tim,

I noticed that in tdelibs remained one dependency on libogg-dev-la.
It is the intent or omission?

Slavek
--