Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2013, 23:40:33 schrieb Timothy Pearson:
> To everyone on this list, how does the KDE4 version of KHTML compare with
> WebKit?  Better or worse compatibility with most websites?  If KHTML is
> pretty much the same as WebKit as far as CPU/RAM usage and website
> compatibility, the easiest solution would be to integrate KHTML as a 
> kioslave in very much the same way as the old version of KHTML works now
> in TDE...

I use konqueror currently with the webkit kpart rendering enabeled - this does 
usually work reasonably well on sites where the khtml part has problems.
sometimes, khtml is better, though.
switching rendering engine is a breeze, once figured out, how to do it :)
can't say anything about ram/cpu-usage.

Werner