Message: previous - next
Month: May 2013

RE: [trinity-users] kmail

From: "Douglas Wooster" <dmw@...>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 03:24:19 -0400
How common is it to want to invoke the screensaver sometimes with locking
and sometimes without locking, on the same computer?  If you never use
locking, can you not still configure the screensaver to not lock, and then
use the same Ctrl+Alt+L ?  Or does Ctrl+Alt+L now cause locking, even if the
screensaver was configured to not lock?


-----Original Message-----
From: Sl�vek Banko [mailto:slavek.banko@...]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 6:37 PM
To: trinity-users@...
Subject: Re: [trinity-users] kmail

On Tuesday 21 of May 2013 00:24:38 Serghei Amelian wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 May 2013 01:19:43 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> [...]
> > I was unaware of the Ctrl+Alt+S conflict when I introduced the global
> > shortcut to activate the screensaver.  If desired, I can change the
> > screensaver activation sequence to something else, but I would need help
> > finding an intuitive and non-conflicting shortcut to change it to!
> >
> > Tim
> Maybe Ctrl+ScrLk ?

Scroll Lock might be a little confusing, because Ctrl+Alt+S == screen saver
only runs without locking. To lock is used Ctrl+Alt+L.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
Read list messages on the web archive:
Please remember not to top-post: