> 
> For all those deactivating SAK, please give this a quick read:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_attention_key
> 
Thanks for that

> It really is up to you as to whether or not login spoofing is a concern on
> your machine, but I work with multi-user systems in a large environment
> where login spoofing is a definite concern.  Therefore, NOT having an SAK
> option is a blocker that would actually force the use of Windows clients.
> 
OK, understood. So at my little private network that is no thread.

I think the biggest annoyance was "the same keys" (at least to me). Maybe a more UNIX like combination will ease the pain?
And a text modification, which hints to the "information, why" and the "way to deactivate, if save"..