> >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > I have a few concerns about TDE R14 and 3.5.13.2 SRU >> > >> > It seems to me that 3.5.13.2 SRU has next to perfect stability, >> features >> > and reliability, while R14 is not there yet. >> > By looking at this page: http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/ , >> almost >> > all I can see is that the dev team is working very hard to just keep >> R14 >> > in working conditions. Sometimes Amarok doesn't start, sometimes >> desktop >> > or menus are unresponsive for a moment, some themes doesn't work >> > completely and it is not like if the user would benefit from a new set >> of >> > feature or a complete visual overhaul. I cannot see why an user would >> > benefit from using the upcoming R14 when it is compared to the >> stability >> > of 3.5.13.2 SRU. Everything works as it should in 3.5.13.2. It would >> have >> > been a very good ground for improving TDE on top of it. All of this >> > trouble is supposed to be for the integrations of QT4 parts in TDE, >> but it >> > seems to me that in R14, it will be used nowhere, not even for a >> single >> > check-box in a config panel. Maybe it is just me, maybe I would need >> some >> > explanations. >> > >> > I mean that if the efforts has been made to make TDE more attractive >> to >> > new users and to modernize it, it would certainly have more >> popularity. As >> > well as making a new ''outside'' on top of an outdated car is not >> good, >> > changing everything under the hood and keeping the old outdated >> > ''outside'' is certainly not better at all. I know that TDE could be >> > better, if some attention could be thrown at things that are not just >> > under the hood. >> > >> > Just one man's opinion... >> > Tell us what you think! >> > >> > -Alexandre >> > >> >> For starters, look at the number of reported crashes from the threaded >> components of the 3.5.13.x series. Those reports *cannot* be fixed >> without the major threading changes made in TQt3 for R14.0.0. Just >> because something is stable on your system does not mean that it will be >> stable on someone else's system if threading is involved. ;-) Also keep >> in mind that R14 finally gets rid of HAL (and in fact uses many modern >> services for mounting, network management, etc.)--without those changes, >> TDE users would find it increasingly more difficult, if possible at all, >> to perform basic tasks like connecting to wireless networks and mounting >> USB flash drives. >> >> There is a reason that we have been constantly delaying R14--that is to >> make sure R14 is a high quality, stable release. >> >> Tim >> > > Hi, > > Of course, the introduction of the new hardware platform is not what > causes problems and yes, over the time and releases, R14 will get back to > the reliability of 3.5.13.2. > > But with all the renaming issues (which does not improve TDE at all), a > lot of dev time has been used, and this time > would have been better used for things that are not under the hood only. > The current TDE look-and-feel was great in Win XP era, but time has > changed. Interfaces have evolved, sometimes for the worse (MS office > ribbon...) and sometimes for the better (Win 7 and parts of KDE 4). I am > sure that there is some things to do to refresh TDE, but it needs some > openness from the TDE dev team. > > Some pop-ups could be made less intrusive, some widgets could be made to > be less Win95-like and many little details could change, just to make sure > that TDE doesn't die over the time because it was frozen forever in 2005. > MATE has already improved its theming and color scheme to refresh its > appearance. Their website is more attractive, and it doesn't means that it > has removed features to MATE or that their website is unusable. > > -Alexandre > If you think TDE can be improved in specific ways please let us know, I know at least I am open to this! However, we will not change TDE just for the sake of "modern looks" (typically rather ugly IMHO) or just for the sake of change--the proposed modification needs to have some solid thought behind it as to how it will benefit TDE's users on a functional level. Tim