On 02/14/2011 04:53 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: >> Tim, All >> >> Looks like the Trinity code is invalid: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723#c6 >> >> -- >> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. >> > > Saw that. I'll be fixing SVN shortly. > > Tim > > Thanks Tim, You guys are great. I'll wait for the updates and then dive back in with gcc 4.5.2. The gcc bug was a neat issue. You can see how a simply change to bring the g++ compiler into compliance with standards can reap havoc on existing code. Surprisingly, I understood the issue (the details of which were way over my head). But, the change to gcc in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11764 resulting in gcc >= 4.5 not accepting the existing class constructor made sense. What? - Trinity building on the new gcc? Looks like we have us a modern day desktop in the works :p -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.