On 02/14/2011 04:53 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> Tim, All
>>
>>   Looks like the Trinity code is invalid:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723#c6
>>
>> --
>> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
>>
> 
> Saw that.  I'll be fixing SVN shortly.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 

Thanks Tim,

  You guys are great. I'll wait for the updates and then dive back in with gcc
4.5.2. The gcc bug was a neat issue. You can see how a simply change to bring
the g++ compiler into compliance with standards can reap havoc on existing code.
Surprisingly, I understood the issue (the details of which were way over my
head). But, the change to gcc in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11764 resulting in gcc >= 4.5 not
accepting the existing class constructor made sense.

 What? - Trinity building on the new gcc? Looks like we have us a modern day
desktop in the works :p

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.