On Sunday 16 November 2014 09:23:30 Michael . wrote: > Debian's future is not in doubt. > I find it sad that things like this are being spread. I agree with Michael. Debian's future is not in any doubt. Lisi > On 16 November 2014 15:48, Robert Peters <robertpeters9@...> wrote: > > On 15 November 2014 19:51, David Hare <davidahare@...> wrote: > > > Just note, this is Debian "testing".. things are likely to be broken. I > > > don't know and can't predict what. > > > > > > The future of Debian itself is in doubt (systemd fiasco, which affects > > > > all > > > > > other distros) > > > > > > At the moment, TDE is gaining ground as just about the only > > > > fully-functional > > > > > DE out there for those of us who do not wish to run systemd. The only > > > > other > > > > > alternative seems to be openbox (a WM rather than a DE). > > > > > > Here, a recompiled dbus has removed all systemd dependencies (although > > > I dont use the full TDE "meta"). I just got back "suspend" in TDE > > > logout thanks to consolekit2. > > > > > > I really don't have a clue about skype. > > > > From reading various reports on systemd, I like the idea of a DE that > > doesn't use it. Given the uncertainty about Debian, I might go to > > using Gentoo, or look into the feasibility of using TDE in one of the > > BSDs. > > > > Robert > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > trinity-users-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > trinity-users-help@... > > Read list messages on the web archive: > > http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ > > Please remember not to top-post: > > http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting