On Thursday 30 April 2015 05:13:21 pm Slávek Banko wrote: > On Thursday 30 of April 2015 22:42:37 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Can we have a mention of Slávek's R14 preliminary-stable-builds > > repository on the web-site? > > > > With a short explanation of what it is, along the lines of: more > > up-to-date versions and other architectures/distros can be found at...and > > perhaps the following from an email of Slávek's: > > 1) Add the source to sources.list: > > deb http://mirror.xcer.cz/trinity-sb *distribution-name* deps-r14 > > main-r14 > > > > 2) From some public GPG keyserver download the key and import it into > > APT: sudo apt-key adv --keyserver pks.gpg.cz --recv-keys ED1F4884 > > > > Explanation of why I thought of it now: > > > > Yesterday someone on one of my local LUGs' mailing list complained that > > when he upgraded to Vivid his DE went to pot - I won't bore you with the > > details. He went on: > > > > <quote> > > Because of this, I thought I'd give trinity a go, but that doesn't > > appear to have a vivid release yet. > > > > It looks like it's not my day today. > > </quote> > > > > I hastily wrote sending my guess at the repository entry for Vivid, which > > I immediately confirmed here and ratified to him. > > > > He replied: > > > > <quote> > > Thanks for that. > > > > I was trying to follow the instructions from trinitydesktop.org and > > using the pearsoncomputing ppa. > > > > Have I been looking in the wrong place? > > > > [snip] > > > > I used the repository you suggested, and I've installed trinity > > successfully. > > [snip] > > Until you mentioned it I had no idea that there > > were other repos for trinity. > > </quote> > > > > Whilst R14 preliminary-stable-builds has no pretensions to being Stable, > > it is stable and is a valuable resource to us and could be to others. It > > seems worthy of a mention. > > > > Lisi > > Friends, I have prepared the following wiki page: > > https://wiki.trinitydesktop.org/Preliminary_Stable_Builds > > Any suggestions on where to put the page on the wiki to be easily > accessible to users? Darn..there goes the bandwidth :-) -- Greg M