On Monday 14 September 2015 00:41:04 Greg Madden wrote: > On Sunday 13 September 2015 11:11:35 am Gene Heskett wrote: > > But, while the subject line is still somewhat on topic, I am about to > > nuke kpdf if the package manager will let me. > > > > Neither okular & evince (usually called "Document viewer" in the menu's, > > like its supposed to be a big secret or something) do not have such a > > problem. okular, started from a cli, spits out several little red wagon > > loads of squawks, but works anyway, better than evince IMO. > > > > Can a squawk be filed against kpdf? > > Sure, > > KPDF is showing its age, as are some of the other old KDE apps. > > I use evince here, okular has more features, and they work well for someone > who uses them daily..or has a better memory. I prefer apps do do a few less > tasks and do them well. > > Some tool in my pdf 'toolbox' is pdftk, pdfshuffler, gs with the > 'pdrwrite' option, mupdf, xournal, master-pdf-editor: great tools but free > beer or pay only. > > I have been working with fillable pdf forms, only because the other person > doing it uses an Adobe product theat uses XFA 'enhancements', which no Free > software pdf viewer supports, it is not a published standard or spec. > > > Evince and Okular can do X/FDF fillable forms, For Okular I have to google > to find the feature to enable it, Evince just works, KPDF does not do > fillable forms. I almost always use Evince now. Lisi