On Monday 02 May 2016 13:09:56 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2016 12:00:51 andre_debian@... wrote:
> > I think that Konqueror is not a navigator
> It used to be a superb one.  For years it was my browser of choice.  
> It could  
> be again, but it is not as high a priority as keeping other things going, 
> because there are other good browsers.  There is no other e.g. Amarok!!!  
> (Well, nothing that rivals Amarok-Trinity.)  And the developers can't do 
> everything. Lisi :

I'm asking myself how you can consider that Konqueror
"is a superb one" navigator.

Most of sites don't work properly with Konqueror,
and work perfectly on Firefox or Seamonkey...

> And the developers can't do everything :

I never asked the developers to change Konqueror,
just write that it is good for files manager and not as navigator.

André