Message: previous - next
Month: May 2016

Re: [trinity-users] Re: Plans on updating Konqueror?

From: "Dave Lers" <lists@...>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 09:42:04 -0700
andre_debian@... wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2016 13:09:56 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Monday 02 May 2016 12:00:51 andre_debian@... wrote:
>> > I think that Konqueror is not a navigator
>> It used to be a superb one.  For years it was my browser of choice.

> I'm asking myself how you can consider that Konqueror
> "is a superb one" navigator.

It depends on your definition of "navigator". Almost everything I do
on my PC is done using Konqueror as a navigator to view/play/edit/run
files/programs, local and remote - things no other web browser or file
manager can do. While Konqueror is essentially my desktop and could
get me anyhere I want/need to go, sometimes the menu or taskbar are

That said, it is frustrating that I can only use Konqueror to view
websites I know it can handle. I still use Konqueror as a gateway
browser ('open with Chromium') because there are enough of my regular
sites that still work in Konqueror and I prefer the
simpler/depreciated Google interface. Maybe I'm stubborn, but
Iceweasel and Chromium are pigs and not something to leave running
when you're using a Pi2 PC.

...It's probably a pipe dream, but it would be real nice if there were
a way that I could have a whitelist of sites that would open in
Konqueror with all others automatically opening in an external