On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 09:21:36 -0400 Gene Heskett <gheskett@...> wrote: > On Saturday 02 July 2016 07:08:18 Thierry de Coulon wrote: > > > If I want to delete all of Samba, kmail-trinity, konqueror-trinity, > > tdebase-trinity would get destroyed too (Raspbian Jessie here, but > > I've come accross the same problem with the other distributions). > > > > I fail to see why these dependencies exist. I can imagine situations > > where kmail, konqueror and tdebase could need Samba, but many more > > where they don't. > > > > I have no Windows machine so I never use samba. > > Neither have I. Same with aptitude, I can't remove it, IMSNHO its a > dangerous utility as it destroyed my system about 2 weeks ago, requiring > I re-install 236 packages. I haven't nuked the executables yet, but I > just did a chmod -x on the /usr/bin/aptitude-curses. Now I sit back > and see what complains. Hm... i would say you have damaged /var/lib/dpkg/status, because there is only 3 packages in debian which depend on aptitude and nothing depends on them. And aptitude normally doesnt destroy anything unless you ask it really-really hard, so this hints to it too. > > Same thing essentially with nfs. I found, with Dr. N. Klept's help, that > sshfs is much more transparent, and faster than nfs once setup, > qualifying it for a Just Works(TM) label. > On slow links yes, sshfs is strictly superior to nfs, but on 1Gbit and faster links cpu usage becomes a factor, especially on server side. Sshfs would kill a typical nas-grade cpu on 1Gb. -- Nick Koretsky (nick.koretsky@...)