On Sunday 28 of August 2016 01:17:45 Gene Heskett wrote:
> dd-wrt may have additional bells and whistles.  It seems to need a $70
> router to have the resources to do port forwarding, customized iptables
> rules and such.  However, it has worked so well for me that I have not
> had the urge to try some of the $30 routers.  Competition generally
> leads to a better, cheaper product.
>
> The new user would be wise to survey what is available, and for how
> much. But first learn the lingo well enough to determine if you need
> feature such and such.  dd-wrt is the only one I trust to not have a
> back door in it.  Someone else will have to attest for openwrt, and
> tomato as I have exactly zero experience with them.

I've also previously used the dd-wrt, but after I get to know better 
OpenWRT, it became my first choice. Part of flash is available as a 
regular filesystem. Is there a proper packaging system. In short, much 
more versatile than dd-wrt.

Anyway, when I last looked at the dd-wrt pages, so it seemed to me that 
the development already stagnant for some time.

-- 
Slávek