On Monday 30 April 2018 07:36:14 deloptes wrote:

> William Morder wrote:
> > On the Devuan pages, there is a sort of sub-group who want to stop
> > using dbus. Just like they want to get rid of systemd, so they also
> > don't like dbus.
> >
> > I don't know anything more about it, but perhaps you could look into
> > this?
>
> So there are some extremists :) Is it turning into Debian-Amish
> community :D
>
> without dbus, also bluetooth won't work ... and many other things
>
> regards
>
I will stand in defense of dbus. It and its predecessors have helped to 
automate my email handling to a minimum amount of work for me. With its 
help, an incoming msg, being written to /var/mail/$usr by procmail, is 
available for me to take action in kmail appriximately .25 seconds after 
procmail has closed the file. Losing dbus would multiply the needed  
mouse clicks by 2 or more, and add me as a variable delay to its 
visibility in kmail.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> trinity-users-unsubscribe@... For additional
> commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@... Read
> list messages on the web archive:
> http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to
> top-post:
> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting



-- 
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>