On Monday 12 September 2011 20:07:02 John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> Sorry but as much as there are all kinds of technical and security
> reasons why this should not be done (which I wholeheartedly embrance and
> which is why KDE resisted for so long), the business case is
> overwhelming. �KMail is a non-starter without it in many environments -

sure, but why the heck should it (especially the kde 3.5.x version) be 
a 'starter' in an ms-outlook-crap dominated environment ?
makes no sense, IMHO.
those who want/need things like that, for whatever reason, are surely better 
off with kde 4.x (which has even more 'ms-features' anyways)

werner