Message: previous - next
Month: September 2011

Re: [trinity-users] Which is original and official site

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:43:09 -0500
> On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:17:58 Bimal Rekhadiya wrote:
>> Yes sure.. Here are some links of my work:
>> and so many..
>> These sites are fully developed by me.. I have designed layout and than
>> converted to Wordpress Theme and than created full working website.
> Personally, I have looked at all three and I strongly dislike all three.
> They
> are exclusive not inclusive (i.e. not accessoble to the handicapped), do
> not
> follow web standards (don't work with Konqueror, my usual and preferred
> browser - ironic for sites that are proposed as suitable for Konqueror's
> main
> home) and are far too glitzy.
> Others may, in fact probably will, disagree.  But your work is certainly
> not
> good enough for you to announce that you are highhandedly going to
> redesign 2
> perfectly good, useful and usable sites and render them unusable.  KDE 4
> is
> about glitz and glitter.  Your sites might suit it.  But KDE 3 is about
> functionality, configurability and usability.  As are the present sites.
> Which are also pleasant to look at.  Your sites hurt my eyes.
> Why do we have to have our sites mucked up because you want to use TDE??
> Please don't let us render Trinity into a toy for the young and flashy.
> Sorry to be so assertive: but you don't take hints.
> Lisi

Don't worry, the current sites are here to stay, for many of the reasons
you outlined above! :-)

Bimal, if you truly want to help the project, you could roll up your
sleeves and start working on fixing some of the bug reports at  I am sure there are also translations
into your native tongue that need fixing.  Otherwise, it is just an
instance of majoring on the minors, and of taking something perfectly good
and breaking it just for the sake of doing something.