-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/22/2012 12:40 PM, <=K wrote: > Nah they just owe it to having source code available. The BSDs are > an example.. none of your philosophical freedom talk there, but > they exist. GPL is just better because the dervative works also > have source available. No elitist attitude necessary. That's still wrong. You aren't thinking clearly. The availability of source code is utterly and completely useless unless you have the unrestricted freedom to use, study, modify, and redistribute. Apart from one old and deprecated version, all BSD licenses are free software licenses. They predate the term "open source." You aren't providing an argument against my argument. You are just repeating my argument back to me. Those projects owe their existence to their freedom, not the term "open source." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQC07lAAoJEM5s7GXJ0FEIQNgH/2s1N8Cn7mKmjT3JrKftMe1e LToikGHkiVRuGdgLaYq5fWiNyXMr+hEI+m1pxxeg5VYFLGmX380ugTaod6HScxhA Xp8LI82KbE7iZ7GqzJGOsdhmpBHjAhwC+8Ddo1tAeG15kYpl5kSyN3hPoeRRFXJR nPi+EEx63MYN2+vs/n1M9uATbeu+Ft8Tv0fEndPeF4lfRcm17iLOg/loQk9XFUu+ 9pWimxdTxRHkeI6vyLcVcZhMRVNY/nCfLw7//YYScXkuK1zVbCUuvx8RUVXOmoZn +WfY80ABBh7/4VMMLw8plNtYTpXy7KybqeBB8fEv3oLW3kC3E3GZxGX143y1c8A= =o7FU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----