> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 20:44 +0100, Lisi wrote: >> On Thursday 06 September 2012 18:12:25 Slávek Banko wrote: >> > On Thursday 06 of September 2012 18:12:14 Lisi wrote: >> > > Hello, all :-) >> > > >> > > I am building a computer on which I would like to run Wheezy, but >> with >> > > Trinity DE, of course. Is this a feasible ambition given a) my >> technical >> > > ability (or lack of it!!) and b) the existence of you lot? >> > > >> > > If so, should I, in your estimation, go for a 3.5.14 daily build or >> stick >> > > to 3.5.13.1? Or would it be more sensible to stick to Squeeze? >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > Lisi >> > >> > Hi Lisi, >> > >> > for me seems like a good option Squeeze + Backports + TDE 3.5.13.1. >> > I use exactly this combination. >> > >> > Slavek >> >> Thanks, Slavek and Greg. >> >> I am only just finally abandoning Lenny and 3.5.10! In the ordinary >> way, I >> would have gone straight to Wheezy to avoid yet again clinging to Old >> Stable >> like grim death. But using Trinity in a stable manner is obviously more >> important, since this is my main desktop. (I am reusing my old case, so >> superficially nothing is changing!) >> >> I don't change hardware often, and aim to do a bit of future-proofing. >> (I >> built the recently ousted desktop in 2004!) but it is hopefully OK with >> Linux. I'll report back!! >> >> But I asked for advice, and am basically hearing what I expected. I'll >> go >> with Squeeze+backports+3.5.13.1. >> >> Thanks again, Greg and Slavek. > <snip> > Is there any time frame for a stable Wheezy + 3.5.14? Thanks - John Wheezy itself is not stable, which makes building a stable version of TDE on that platform challenging to say the least. Tim