Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2013, 23:40:33 schrieb Timothy Pearson: > To everyone on this list, how does the KDE4 version of KHTML compare with > WebKit? Better or worse compatibility with most websites? If KHTML is > pretty much the same as WebKit as far as CPU/RAM usage and website > compatibility, the easiest solution would be to integrate KHTML as a > kioslave in very much the same way as the old version of KHTML works now > in TDE... I use konqueror currently with the webkit kpart rendering enabeled - this does usually work reasonably well on sites where the khtml part has problems. sometimes, khtml is better, though. switching rendering engine is a breeze, once figured out, how to do it :) can't say anything about ram/cpu-usage. Werner