On Sunday 16 November 2014 09:23:30 Michael . wrote:
> Debian's future is not in doubt.
> I find it sad that things like this are being spread.

I agree with Michael.  Debian's future is not in any doubt.

Lisi

> On 16 November 2014 15:48, Robert Peters <robertpeters9@...> wrote:
> > On 15 November 2014 19:51, David Hare <davidahare@...> wrote:
> > > Just note, this is Debian "testing".. things are likely to be broken. I
> > > don't know and can't predict what.
> > >
> > > The future of Debian itself is in doubt (systemd fiasco, which affects
> >
> > all
> >
> > > other distros)
> > >
> > > At the moment, TDE is gaining ground as just about the only
> >
> > fully-functional
> >
> > > DE out there for those of us who do not wish to run systemd. The only
> >
> > other
> >
> > > alternative seems to be openbox (a WM rather than a DE).
> > >
> > > Here, a recompiled dbus has removed all systemd dependencies (although
> > > I dont use the full TDE "meta"). I just got back "suspend" in TDE
> > > logout thanks to consolekit2.
> > >
> > > I really don't have a clue about skype.
> >
> > From reading various reports on systemd, I like the idea of a DE that
> > doesn't use it.  Given the uncertainty about Debian, I might go to
> > using Gentoo, or look into the feasibility of using TDE in one of the
> > BSDs.
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > trinity-users-unsubscribe@...
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > trinity-users-help@...
> > Read list messages on the web archive:
> > http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
> > Please remember not to top-post:
> > http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting