trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: December 2014

Re: [trinity-users] Confusion about building from sources (R13.2 on Slack 14.1)

From: Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro@...>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:02:47 +0900
On 12/07/2014 10:18 PM, Jagged O'Neill wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:31:24AM -0500, E. Liddell wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 01:56:59 +0100
>>>
>>> 1. It doesn't say which release this is about. [...]
>>
>> It was ported from the old wiki, so unless someone's changed it
>> recently, it's for 13.X.
>>
>>> 2. It isn't clear about the build tool to use for the different
>>> packages. When talking about the autoconf -> cmake migration, there
>>> should be some details of which package in which release is to be
>>> done with which build tool, or each package should have a quick note
>>> about this in the README or whatever...
>>
>> "List of Packages Building with cmake" says " Build everything not in the
>> list above with autotools."  autoconf is part of autotools.
>>
>> If you think that's unclear, can you suggest a better way to word it?
>
> No, sorry, I wasn't unclear about that I meant this in conjunction
> with point 1.; an Idea would be to make one list for any "initial"
> release, and for each subsequent release another list that says
> which packages have been migrated to cmake meanwhile.
>
> (One point why I thought this is all about R14 is that the package
> names are given as tdelibs, tdebase, etc., while the package files
> I downloaded (from http://copernicus.mirrorservice.org/sites/trinitydesktop.org/trinity/releases/3.5.13.2/) are still named kdelibs, kdebase, etc.)
>
> Another idea, IMHO even better would be a table, one row per package,
> one column per Trinity release, stating the respective build tool to
> use as (a)utoconf, (c)make or (m)anual --- just an idea.
>
>> (That's a sincere question, not an attempt to needle you.  The more people
>> understand the wiki, the more of them will have a good experience with
>> Trinity.)
>>
>>> No idea if I should attach the error output from a cmake approach.
>>
>> Do, please, since that's the expected build system for tqtinterface.
>
> Okay, the logs are from a run in which I passed "-ldl -lpthread -lX11
> -lXext -lz -ljpeg -lmng -lpng" already. There's not a lot missing,
> but this makes the error log quite some bytes shorter.
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Jagged
>

Hi,
I do not use Slackware, but at this link you should be able to find additional building instruction for TDE on Slackware.
http://www.giustetti.net/wiki/index.php?title=En/trinity_desktop_environment

Cheers
   Michele