trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: February 2015

Re: [trinity-users] k3b-trinity and blu-ray -- possibly solved

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:55:48 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224

>
>
> On Monday 23 February 2015 11:22:02 am Thierry de Coulon wrote:
>> On Monday 23 February 2015 18.10:52 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> > I'm not surprised at that; I boycotted Blu-Ray a long time ago due to
>> > it's primary use as a DRM enforcement technology* and therefore don't
>> > have any Blu-Ray equipment with which to enhance k3b.
>> >
>> > Tim
>>
>> I've ordered an external burner - I'm not interrested in Blu-Ray itself,
>> but my Photo archive would require dozens of DVDs to secure  (I remember
>> creating a set of 25 floppies to install OS/2, but that was long time
>> ago).
>>
>> I understand Blu-Ray uses DRM to handle video, but does this mean it's
>> also
>> required to burn data? I want to burn Blu-Ray M-Discs (data only).
>>
>> I'll switch to another  OS if necessary (as it would only be for an
>> archival process) but of course I'd rather do it with Linux (and Trinity
>> if
>> possible).
>>
>> If I can provide any information once the hardware is there...
>>
>> Thierry
>
> No drm for data/personal use; is the drm on the movie discs or in the
> firmare ?

Both actually.  Commercial disks are encrypted with the keys distributed
to the players in their firmware AFAIK--this makes it so that only select
manufacturers can play and/or create commercial video disks.

For most uses there are better options than Blu-Ray disks; there is a
small window in around the 100GB range that they might be useful but
honestly it would be more reliable at similar cost to buy a used LTO tape
system for that purpose.  In general I wouldn't trust organic optical
media; the lifetimes are much, much shorter than typically stated even
when stored in a cool dry environment.  Blu-Ray disks' primary use is for
DRMed movie distribution; if it weren't for that they would have become
obsolete long ago. :-)

Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iFYEARELAAYFAlTsBFQACgkQLaxZSoRZrGEvaADcCFtqSMfwEaO8vMK0TkCCT3qj
cPnDu9QyYk2mzgDgzIoRVhiegLpY3jt945cJAwuABkBE+ZU5Goh88w==
=tP9R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----