On Wednesday 06 May 2015 13:26:10 Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:23:58PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Yesterday I filed a wish-bug. I am very conscious of what is involved > > and of how precious the developer effort and time is. The person who > > told me to ask said that it would be quick and easy, but quick and easy > > are both very subjective words. > > Here is the bug report again: > > http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2440 > > Unfortunately, for some reason I can't view the screen shot, but I think > I know what you are referring to. > > I think you mean that Kmail displays HTML emails as raw HTML code, like > the "View Source" in a web browser, full of < > tags and other > formatting information. Is that what you mean? Yes, that is exactly what I mean. > I must say I've never noticed that when I was using Kmail, but I'm > currently using mutt almost exclusively. > > It might be helpful to mention how mutt deals with HTML mail. Of course, > being mutt, nearly everything is configurable, but this is how I have it > set up: when an email contains both a plain text version of the message > and a html version of the message, mutt will display the plain text > version. I have KMail set to do that, but even then I sometimes get gobbledy-gook. Here is a short extract from teh _plain_ _text_ part of a multipart email from a local supermarket: "Morrisonsbody { width: 100%; } /* Outlook link fix */ #outlook a {padding:0;} /* Hotmail background & line height fixes */ .ExternalClass {width:100% !important;} .ExternalClass, .ExternalClass p, .ExternalClass b, .ExternalClass span, .ExternalClass font, .ExternalClass td, .ExternalClass div, .ExternalClass br {line-height: 100%;} /* Image " > But if the email only has a html version, mutt calls out to the "links" > text-based web browser, and gets it to dump the html message to a plain > text version. links knows how to extract the message content, ignoring > irrelevant tags and formatting information. "lynx" is another text-only > browser capable of a similar html-to-text dump. In either case, all you > see is the plain text, with no <tags>. > > Is that what you are after? YES!!!! I hadn't realised taht it could be done. > My own feeling is that any graphical email client should show the plain > text message (when available), and if not available, you should have a > choice between showing the html message either formatted and rendered in > all it's glory (or horror), or as plain text with the formatting > removed. That would be GREAT!!! That is what I would like for KMail, now I know that it can be done. That exactly is what I am requesting in my wish-bug. Lisi