On Sunday 29 April 2018 02:27:33 Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. April 2018 schrieb deloptes:
> > In my opinion the PGPG support in KMail is pretty sufficient to enable
> > secure communication with any recipient.
> > Why would you bother paying for something you already have?
> >
> > I ask myself if you clearly understand the concept of encrypted mails?
> >
> > regards
>
> The point of protinmail - as I see it - was an email address, that could
> not be associated with a real person. But protonmail changed the initial
> user authentication to require a handy or some other identifyable device,
> so the main purpose is gone.
>
> But what I miss in kamil+PGPG is an encrypted mail-subject, e.g "Subject:
> [trinity-users] Re: more re. tde and qt5" beeing replaced by a random
> string, which gets replaced on the receiver side with an embedded subject
> from within the encrypted mail. Reason is, that a lot of users use a
> subject that tells a lot about the mail content, at least enough to let it
> be sorted in "interesting" or "junk".
>
> Nik

Another good point! 

Bill