On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 20:44 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Thursday 06 September 2012 18:12:25 Sl�vek Banko wrote: > > On Thursday 06 of September 2012 18:12:14 Lisi wrote: > > > Hello, all :-) > > > > > > I am building a computer on which I would like to run Wheezy, but with > > > Trinity DE, of course. Is this a feasible ambition given a) my technical > > > ability (or lack of it!!) and b) the existence of you lot? > > > > > > If so, should I, in your estimation, go for a 3.5.14 daily build or stick > > > to 3.5.13.1? Or would it be more sensible to stick to Squeeze? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Lisi > > > > Hi Lisi, > > > > for me seems like a good option Squeeze + Backports + TDE 3.5.13.1. > > I use exactly this combination. > > > > Slavek > > Thanks, Slavek and Greg. > > I am only just finally abandoning Lenny and 3.5.10! In the ordinary way, I > would have gone straight to Wheezy to avoid yet again clinging to Old Stable > like grim death. But using Trinity in a stable manner is obviously more > important, since this is my main desktop. (I am reusing my old case, so > superficially nothing is changing!) > > I don't change hardware often, and aim to do a bit of future-proofing. (I > built the recently ousted desktop in 2004!) but it is hopefully OK with > Linux. I'll report back!! > > But I asked for advice, and am basically hearing what I expected. I'll go > with Squeeze+backports+3.5.13.1. > > Thanks again, Greg and Slavek. <snip> Is there any time frame for a stable Wheezy + 3.5.14? Thanks - John