On 12/3/2011 3:04 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> I know it's not much help, but "polished" could be used as well as
> "professional".  The only thing that comes to mind right now would be a
> font size/style policy, to make the site look less thrown-together.
> Having only a handful of allowed font size/styles to choose from would
> give a better impression of cohesiveness IMHO.  Such a policy would also
> dictate which fonts to use for headers (and what constitutes a
> header/levels of headers!) and main body text, etc.
Guys, just want to add something. Yes, "polished" is the word I should 
have used.
I apologize. It is only an opinion (my personal opinion) and as others 
have stated,
you shouldn't waste too much time on a website as the project itself is 
more important.
Just like TDE, your website is very usable. I was only commenting on its 
appearance. I had
no issues finding links at all. The top bar is very friendly. The 
"Official Trinity Binaries" section
on your front page is informative and usable. Probably Calvin has spent 
a lot of time on the site
and I didn't mean to underestimate his work at all. I know my post looks 
that way, I apologize.
I should have been more specific. Again, I meant "polished" and not 
professional. As an example,
you can look at the appearance of kubuntu.org. Again, the site is very 
usable (which is very important).