trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: July 2012

Re: [trinity-users] [sort of OT] Trinity etc. are damaging Linux

From: Brad Alexander <storm16@...>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:47:20 -0400
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Bryan Baldwin <bryan@...> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/25/2012 12:59 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
>> unlike Mate and Cinnamon (and the other desktops available for
>> Linux), Unity has never been made available to other distros
>
> Well, if Unity is under a free software license, I can't agree. Just
> because no one other then Canonical sees any value in supporting it
> doesn't make it wrong.
>
> If Unity has a non-free license, then I agree with you.

Concur. And if I am honest, I could not be bothered to look up the
license. Like you, I avoid Ubuntu like the plague. I went back to
dumped Ubuntu and went back to Debian around Gutsy. Between the broken
encryption in the installer and the beginnings of what I saw as the
writing on the wall (which has borne out over the years), I'm much
happier with pure Debian.